And now the major powers of the world, U.S., China and Russia have a weapons production based economy and therefore the only outcome is continuous war. Sadly since President Eisenhowers warning it has become a government of people by the international corporations, of the international corporations and by the international corporations. more accurately we need protection from the federal government who are supposed to be of the people, by the people and for the people. Personally I need no protection from powers outside the U. Then as it was designed to sweep into the situation with the means to protect the population of said nation but certain rights will have to be given up (temporarily, lmao) so as to have the necessary freedom to protect the population. Governments around the world have been using the tried and true methods of starting problems and panic from behind the scenes a-la the Riechstad fire in 1933 and the 9-11 attacks as well as disease and too many more to count.
As B Franklin wrote “to exchange rights for protection leaves you with neither” and these words were accurate then and prophetic when looking at America today. Google employees (the majority of) have had to sign national security act paperwork years ago when the cia got themselves completely embedded with Google citing both Patriots acts and subsequently homeland security acts, nsa as well which have all basically suspended the constitution and the majority of the public have no idea. Good luck advocating for change, in the world where NO manufacturer is effectively accountable anymore for highly reliable performance of consumer computer platforms (including phones), be it hardware or software. How many viable alternatives are there for the customer or even for the manufacturers (given contractual issues, delivery reliability, deadlines, and consumer flexibility and trust)? After all these questions are answered, does the business model to implement a solution make sense? If you can’t get useful answers to ALL of those questions, then you have your answer right there why nobody is doing anything to make it stop.Īlso, I didn’t even mention the possible influence of corporate and/or state corruption in promoting this “feature”. How many customers even know this problem exists and how many are interested in getting rid of the problem? What kind of costs in money, choice, effort, and time will they expend to rid themselves of this problem (even figuring out that effort is vague, and thus frustrating and dissuading). Posted in Security Hacks Tagged app, china, osint, packet capture, phone, preinstalled, security, server, smartphone, virus Post navigationīecause that requires a successful business model that provides a viable alternative to an interested customer. There are some alternatives though if you are interested in open-source phones.
#Samsung battery spy device software
It’s an interesting problem that probably shouldn’t exist on any phone, let alone a flagship phone competing with various iPhones, but it does highlight some security concerns we should all have with our daily use devices when we can’t control the software on the hardware that we supposedly own. It seems to be fairly legitimate at this point as well, and another user named was able to provide a temporary solution/workaround in the comments on the original post. These revelations came about recently on Reddit from who made the original claims. This was all discovered through the use of packet capture and osint, which are discussed in the post. The company is known for exceptionally bad practices concerning virus scanning, and the software has been accused of sending all information about files on the phone to servers in China, which could then turn all of the data it has over to the Chinese government. This particular application is made by a Chinese company called Qihoo 360 and can’t be removed from the phone without using ADB or having root. This software in question is a “storage cleaner” in the “Device Care” section of the phone, which is supposed to handle file optimization and deletion. Often these phones come with “default” apps that can’t be removed through ordinary means, or can’t even be disabled, and the latest discovery related to pre-loaded software on Samsung phones seems to be of a pretty major security vulnerability.
#Samsung battery spy device android
Samsung may have the highest-end options for hardware if you want an Android smartphone, but that hasn’t stopped them from making some questionable decisions on the software they sometimes load on it.
0 kommentar(er)
